| 摘要: |
| “境内加工—境外销售”商标侵权纠纷案件的裁判思路和涉案行为模式的法律性质尚待明确。此类案件应适用三阶式的裁判思路进行处理：明确涉案贸易模式是否属于涉外定牌加工；基于行为与效果二分理论，判断涉案行为是否构成商标使用行为以及是否导致混淆可能性；适用兜底条款，评估涉案行为是否产生其他实质性损害。通过类型化分析，各类行为模式都构成商标使用行为，但是侵权判断结果不同。实践中应确立“境内加工—境外销售”不侵犯境内商标权的原则，而以“产品出口转内销”“存在关联事实”以及“非涉外定牌加工”为不侵犯境内商标权的例外情形。 |
| 关键词: “境内加工—境外销售” 裁判思路 定牌加工 商标侵权 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目:国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(项目编号:202406270190)；河南省法学会民法学研究会课题“商标法中的拟制人标准及其适用研究”(项目编号:HNCLS(2023)19)。 |
|
| Research on the Judicial Thinking and the Types of the Trademark Infringement Cases of Domestic Processing-Overseas Sales |
| LI Hao |
|
| Abstract: |
| The judicial thinking and the legal nature of involved behavior patterns of trademark infringement of“domestic processing-overseas sales”have yet to be clarified. These cases apply the“three-step”judicial thinking. First, it is clear whether or not the trade model in case belongs to OEM. Second, applying the“behavior and effect of trademark use”dichotomy to determine whether the behavior pattern in the case is trademark use and whether there is likelihood of confusion. Third, applying the same clause to assess whether the case produce other“material harm”. All behavior patterns are trademark use, but their infringement established or not is different. By analyzing typically, the principle that the“domestic processing-overseas sales”does not infringe on trademark right and exception of that are“export to domestic sales”“harmful relevant facts”and“non-OEM”should be established in practice. |
| Key words: domestic processing-overseas sales judicial thinking OEM trademark infringement |
